BRIEF HISTORY OF THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT

The political homosexual movement is barely forty years old. However it did not receive impetus until
a campaign was launched in America in 1989 by a handful of Harvard graduates
in marketing, using psychological techniques to sell a product to an unsuspecting populce.

There is "exaction pricing" in the form of a pound of flesh that must be paid for non-compliance.
In a mere twenty years, the movement has developed into an international juggernaut,
which threatens all who stand in its way.

An article by Paul Rondeau, who has thoroughly researched this subject, is well-worth reading.

Also well worth reading in full is an article on the Concerned Voter blog, Same-sex "marriage" : a secular
point of view. Research demonstrates that homosexuality is neither natural or normal.

A giant propaganda agenda has been very successful, due to the unremitting insistance to keep pushing,
despite whatever resistance is put up againt it. People are eventually worn down and become ready to capitulate.

It is contrary to reason and to biological science to compare a same-sex attraction with a racial identity.
The Human Genome Project  failed to identify a "gay gene".

Propaganda tells us that some people are "born gay". There is no scientific evidence to support this
hypothesis, which has succeeded in brainwashing millions around the world.

An assertion that sexual orientation can never change is likewise false. Research has demonstrated
that such change has occurred in many cases. A merciless vengence is inflicted on formerly
homosexual persons who have decided to leave the lifestyle.
This is something which the lobbyists can not tolerate, as it exposes the falsity of pseudo-science
which is the principle means of success.

Reference is made to the Top ten myths about homosexuality by Peter Sprigg and the Family Research Council.

The chief strategy is to portray all who disagree with the "gay rights" lobby agenda as bigots, ignorant, intolerant,
hateful, and, of course, homophobes, which is a political, not a psychiatric term. Those who oppose same-sex "marriage" must
be "motivated by hate". No person can read a human mind to determine whether or not any words are motivated by hate. Indeed, insofar as evidence indicates, whatever hatred there is flows in the opposite direction.

In reaction to Proposition 8, a referendum to re-establish natural marriage in California, infuriated lobbyists
engaged in threats and actual violence against religious groups and private citizens who had supported Prop 8.
"Tolerance" was thrown to the winds, by hurling racial slurs at African Americans, even against fellow-homosexuals.
These incidents were largely ignored by the mainstream media. Legal action failed, but a new case has since been initiated, wherein an individual District Court  Judge Walker took it on himself to declare that the decision of
the people was "unconstitutional". What does that say for democracy?